The Ministry of Health (MoH) assessed whether the conditions for increasing reimbursement on the grounds of ensuring at least one fully reimbursed medicinal product within a group of substitutable products had been met in the context of a comprehensive review (Section 39c(5) of the Public Health Insurance Act).
According to the MoH, it was not possible to designate the
product referenced in the proceedings as a relevant fully reimbursed medicinal
product for two main reasons:
Full reimbursement for the group of patients with the indication of bladder cancer could therefore not be ensured through the assessed product but was secured through other medicinal products.
Are you interested in reading regular commentaries on decisions by Pharmeca a.s.? Feel free to contact us.
At Pharmeca, we help you navigate the complex landscape of pharmaceutical and medical device information. We also offer flexible services that can be tailored to your needs at any time.
Our market position and experience allow us to support you whenever you need expert guidance.
Our knowledge, your opportunity.
Articles on decision-making practice are based on publicly available texts from the decisions of the Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic and the State Institute for Drug Control (SÚKL).
A continuously updated overview of decisions issued by SÚKL and the Ministry of Health in the field of pricing and reimbursement is available on the Pharmeca a.s. website.
The text was translated using ChatGPT 5.2.