At the beginning of December, the State Institute for Drug Control (SÚKL) held a seminar entitled Current Topics in Price and Reimbursement Regulation. The following article presents key practical information delivered at the seminar and includes SÚKL’s interpretation of selected topics previously addressed in the Dawn of the Amendment to the Public Health Insurance Act series.
This article is therefore a transcription of texts based on presentations published on the SÚKL website, where their full versions are available.
The amendment in the area of medicinal products intended for immunisation will ensure full reimbursement of more effective and more modern vaccines.
By submitting an application for the determination of reimbursement pursuant to Section 39db et seq., it is possible to request:
Types of administrative proceedings under the amendment:
Administrative proceedings are initiated only upon submission of the second application, which must be filed within 30 days of the first application. The web-based application forms have been amended to require explicit indication that the case concerns a joint proceeding with another medicinal product.
Withdrawal of one of the applications leads to termination of the
proceedings; all applicants have dispositive rights over the subject matter of
the application.
Assessment of Highly innovative medicinal product (VILP) status
Assessment of Orphan (LPVO) Status
Initiation of an abbreviated review (ZR) following entry of the first PP
Under the amendment, the abbreviated review is initiated only after verification of commercial availability (pursuant to Sections 13a and 13b of Decree No. 376/2011 Coll.) of a reimbursed similar product in relation to the originally reimbursed product.
The market share of all similar products within the relevant ATC group is assessed for a given calendar month, excluding the originally reimbursed product:
Comprehensive review (HR)
Section 39l(3): a reduction of the base reimbursement by more than 80% compared to the base reimbursement established in the first completed comprehensive review.
The justification for applying this provision is assessed either directly within the ongoing comprehensive review or after issuance of a decision in an abbreviated review in which reimbursement decreased by more than 80%.
A comprehensive review cannot be initiated if, within the last 12 months, a decision has been issued in another comprehensive review within the same group of essentially therapeutically interchangeable medicinal products.
In an individual administrative proceeding (ISŘ) concerning a
change in the amount and conditions of reimbursement (VaPÚ), it is not possible
to establish more restrictive reimbursement conditions than those set in the
most recent comprehensive review.
Abbreviated review (ZR)
Abbreviated reimbursement reviews are differentiated for groups containing ZÚLP (savings of CZK 20 million) and groups not containing ZÚLP (savings of CZK 30 million).
Removal of the statutory three-year time limit for conducting an abbreviated maximum price review.
Abbreviated reviews (cost-saving, including savings based on DNC/DoÚ) cannot be initiated if another abbreviated review decision for the same medicinal product group was issued within the last 12 months.
Abbreviated maximum price reviews are conducted for reference groups or groups of essentially therapeutically interchangeable products (the rule based on active substance and route of administration has been removed).
VILP criteria
a) The primary clinically relevant endpoint in the clinical trial demonstrated at least a 30% improvement in a quality-of-life–relevant parameter in direct comparison, or at least a 35% improvement in indirect comparison versus reimbursed therapy; in the case of progression-free survival, median PFS must be extended by at least three months; or
b) Median overall survival is prolonged by at least 30% versus reimbursed therapy, and by at least three months; where median OS is not reached, a reduction in the OS hazard ratio of at least 35% versus reimbursed therapy is demonstrated; or
c) A medicinal product with conditional marketing authorisation pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 726/2004, where no alternative with permanent or temporary reimbursement exists, or where the alternative is supportive or symptomatic treatment only, and the MAH has committed to reimbursing health insurance funds for costs incurred should the conditional authorisation expire, lapse or be withdrawn.
For medicinal products with conditional marketing authorisation applying for VILP status under point (c), criteria under points (a) and (b) are not assessed. The sole condition is the absence of causal treatment within the reimbursement system and the conclusion of an agreement.
Section 17(6): ...upon request of a health insurance fund or MAH, the Institute assesses the benefits and costs associated with the use of such medicinal products. MAHs, health insurance funds and relevant professional societies provide cooperation.
Models – general requirements
The procedure for determining the maximum price (MC) for medicinal products that are significant for the provision of healthcare and which the Ministry of Health, with regard to the public interest in maintaining their availability, designates in a special price measure (Section 39a(3)) is as follows:
a) the average of prices in up to seven reference basket countries, provided that the medicinal product is present in at least two reference basket countries;
b) the average of identified prices within the EU, where point (a) cannot be applied;
c) a therapeutically comparable medicinal product (TPLP) in the Czech Republic, where points (a) and (b) cannot be applied
(i.e. the lowest price of a medicinal product containing the same active substance, pharmaceutical form and strength; where more than one TPLP exists, the lowest price of the medicinal product with the same or the closest pack size is used);
d) the average price of TPLP in the reference basket, where points (a) to (c) cannot be applied
(from each reference basket country, the lowest price of a medicinal product containing the same active substance, pharmaceutical form and strength is used; where more than one such product exists, the lowest price of the medicinal product with the same or the closest pack size is applied).
Determination of MC / Price Referencing
Pursuant to the amendment to Decree No. 376/2011 Coll., new rules apply concerning the relevant exchange rate and exceptions in situations where, during price referencing for the purpose of MC determination, the exchange rate deviation exceeds 10% compared to the average quarterly exchange rates over the preceding six calendar months:
Exclusion of a Foreign Price from External Reference Pricing
Determination of the base reimbursement amount (Section 39c(2)(a) of the Public Health Insurance Act)
Manufacturer price / ODTD in the EU:
Determination of Reimbursement / Price Referencing
Where the relevant exchange rate deviates by more than 10% compared to the average quarterly exchange rates of the foreign exchange market published by the Czech National Bank over the preceding six calendar quarters, conversion into Czech currency is carried out using the average exchange rate published by the Czech National Bank over the preceding six calendar quarters (Section 11(2) of the Decree).
Determination of Base Reimbursement / Price Referencing
In the event of the introduction of market-wide measures, the Institute excludes the identified foreign manufacturer price in the EU Member State analogously pursuant to Section 7(3) (Section 12(4) of the Decree).
Where the deviation of the lowest identified price is ≥ 20% compared to the average of the second and third lowest prices, the price extreme is excluded. This does not apply to VILP and LPVO (Section 16(2) of the Decree).
Source:
YOUNG, Michaela; ŽÁČKOVÁ, Kristýna a CHYTILOVÁ, Petra. Seminář SÚKL č. 19 – Sekce cenové a úhradové regulace: Úhrada vakcín 2026. Online. In: . 2025. Dostupné z: https://sukl.gov.cz/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/5.-Uhrada-vakcin-2026.pdf. [cit. 2025-12-18].
ŠVORCOVÁ, Tatiana; CHYTILOVÁ, Petra a VYSEKALOVÁ, Eva. Seminář
SÚKL č. 19 – Sekce cenové a úhradové regulace: Novela ZoVZP - další změny.
Online. In: . 2025. Dostupné z: https://sukl.gov.cz/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/6.-Novela-ZoVZP-%E2%80%93-dalsi-zmeny.pdf. [cit.
2025-12-18].
At Pharmeca, we help you navigate the complex landscape of pharmaceutical and medical device information. We also offer flexible services that can be tailored to your needs at any time.
Our market position and experience allow us to support you whenever you need expert guidance.
Feel free to contact us.
Our knowledge, your opportunity.
The text was translated using ChatGPT 5.2.