The amendment
changes the rules for assessing Highly Innovative Medicinal Products by
defining several criteria under which medicines may be included in this group.
It changes the
conditions for any application of the statutory limitation of the reimbursement
amount.
Changes also occur
in the cost-limitation agreements between marketing authorisation holders and
payers, which will now be mandatory, with a possible sanction in the form of
loss of temporary reimbursement.
Lastly, the
patient’s right to complete ongoing treatment at the expense of the marketing
authorisation holder has been updated.
A completely new
element is a joint reimbursement proceeding for combinations with a VILP,
intended to address situations where only one product in the combination has an
established reimbursement.
In brief: the amendment
On 12 August 2025, the amendment to the Act on Public Health Insurance was promulgated in the Collection of Laws as No. 289/2025 Coll. Its general effective date is 1 January 2026, with selected provisions taking effect during 2026 or in subsequent years.
The amendment proposes substantial changes to the regulation of public health insurance. In the area of pricing and reimbursement of medicinal products, it will affect, for example: the process of external price referencing (EPR), the rules on deemed availability, the definition of Highly Innovative Medicinal Products (VILP), proceedings on reimbursement for VILPs and orphan medicinal products (LPVOs) used in combination, contractual commitments with payers, assessment of a product as an LPVO, similar medicinal products, lis pendens (litispendence), the submission of models, and review (revision) proceedings.
The reimbursement mechanism will also change—especially for vaccines and monoclonal antibodies intended for prophylaxis—and a special procedure for immunization medicines will be introduced.
At Pharmeca, we help you navigate the complex landscape of
pharmaceutical and medical device information. We also offer flexible services
that can be tailored to your needs at any time.
Our market position and experience allow us to support you whenever you
need expert guidance.
As part of our new article series, we briefly outline the key changes in the medicines domain linked to the amendment to the Act on Public Health Insurance. This time: highly Innovative Medicinal...
The Act on Public Health
Insurance provides that the amount and conditions of temporary reimbursement
for Highly Innovative Medicinal Products (VILP) are set for a period of 3
years, with the possibility of re-setting the reimbursement for no more than an
additional 2 years.
In an ongoing administrative
proceeding on the first temporary reimbursement for a VILP in tablet form, the
State Institute for Drug Control (the Institute) proposes to limit the duration
of the first temporary reimbursement so that it expires at the same time as the
first temporary reimbursement of a therapeutically interchangeable medicine
with the same active substance in capsule form for the same indication.
Accordingly, in this case, the first temporary reimbursement for the tablets
will be granted for a period shorter than 3 years.
The Institute also states that the public health insurance
expenditure on reimbursement of the product in tablet form, supplied to insured
persons during the validity of the temporary reimbursement decision, must not
exceed the amount specified in the budget impact analysis that served as the
basis for the decision in the previous administrative proceeding on the first
temporary reimbursement of the therapeutically interchangeable capsule
formulation.
Are you interested in reading regular commentaries on decisions by
Pharmeca a.s.? Feel free to contact us.
At Pharmeca, we help you navigate the complex landscape of
pharmaceutical and medical device information. We also offer flexible services
that can be tailored to your needs at any time.
Our market position and experience allow us to support you whenever you
need expert guidance.
A continuously
updated overview of decisions issued by SÚKL and the Ministry of Health in the
field of pricing and reimbursement is available on the Pharmeca a.s. website.
In response to requests from applicants (manufacturers/suppliers of ZUM) whose devices are listed in the ÚK VZP – ZP, VZP has also published a list of VZP codes for which, as of 7 October 2025, it records terminal EMDN branches; see List of ZUM with a Terminal EMDN Branch.
The LPVO
status will newly be assessed only at the moment of issuing the first
reimbursement decision under Section 39da of the Act on Public
Health Insurance.
The amendment
introduces stricter filing requirements for applications and further
expands the rights of selected stakeholders.
The role of payers
is strengthened; they will be able to request reimbursement reviews in
additional situations.
Certain rules
for re-assessing LPVO reimbursement due to unmet assumptions are modified.
The applicant
will be required to express an active disagreement with a change opinion
issued by the Ministry of Health (MoH).
New rules
are introduced for LPVO reimbursement in combinations, whether with a
VILP (Highly Innovative Medicinal Product) or with another LPVO.
Agreements
with payers will become an important step, notably due to changes to the
rules for compensating costs.
In brief: the amendment
On 12 August 2025, the amendment to the Act on Public Health Insurance was promulgated in the Collection of Laws as No. 289/2025 Coll. Its general effective date is 1 January 2026, with selected provisions taking effect during 2026 or in subsequent years.
The amendment proposes substantial changes to the regulation of public health insurance. In the area of pricing and reimbursement of medicinal products, it will affect, for example: the process of external price referencing (EPR), the rules on deemed availability, the definition of Highly Innovative Medicinal Products (VILP), proceedings on reimbursement for VILPs and orphan medicinal products (LPVOs) used in combination, contractual commitments with payers, assessment of a product as an LPVO, similar medicinal products, lis pendens (litispendence), the submission of models, and review (revision) proceedings.
The reimbursement mechanism will also change—especially for vaccines and monoclonal antibodies intended for prophylaxis—and a special procedure for immunization medicines will be introduced.
At Pharmeca, we help you navigate the complex landscape of
pharmaceutical and medical device information. We also offer flexible services
that can be tailored to your needs at any time.
Our market position and experience allow us to support you whenever you
need expert guidance.
As part of our new article series, we briefly outline the key changes in the medicines domain linked to the amendment to the Act on Public Health Insurance. This time: orphan medicinal products.
The Ministry of Health of the Czech
Republic agreed to grant reimbursement for an orphan medicinal product (LPVO)
in the indication treatment of advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST).
The medicine is intended for a small patient population and, although the
expected duration of therapy is measured in months and its effect is not
curative, it enables a significant prolongation of progression-free survival
while maintaining a good quality of life.
The advisory board unanimously supported
inclusion of this product in reimbursement, as the evidence in the file
demonstrated its efficacy in fourth-line treatment of a rare malignancy for
which no therapeutic alternative exists and where there is a clear unmet
medical need.
The Ministry’s approval was justified,
inter alia, by the fact that patients’ conditions require rapid treatment
initiation, which individual exceptional reimbursement applications under
Section 16 do not accommodate with sufficient flexibility.
According to the reasoning, contractual
arrangements with health insurance companies also contributed to the positive
opinion, resulting in a more favourable projected budget impact—not only
compared with the findings of the assessment report, but also relative to current
Section 16 practice.
Are you interested in reading regular commentaries on decisions by
Pharmeca a.s.? Feel free to contact us.
At Pharmeca, we help you navigate the complex landscape of
pharmaceutical and medical device information. We also offer flexible services
that can be tailored to your needs at any time.
Our market position and experience allow us to support you whenever you
need expert guidance.
A continuously
updated overview of decisions issued by SÚKL and the Ministry of Health in the
field of pricing and reimbursement is available on the Pharmeca a.s. website.
VZP informs applicants about the option to keep non-traded medical devices without EMDN in the Reimbursement Catalogue.
As part of the ongoing refinement of the VZP Reimbursement Catalogue – Medical Devices (ÚK VZP – ZP) and following a request from the Ministry of Health in connection with forthcoming legislation, all medical devices that were included in the ÚK VZP – ZP (ZUM) by 31 December 2023 and that, according to VZP ČR and SZP ČR data, were not traded (no recorded sales) between 1 January 2024 and 30 June 2025, and for which no EMDN category was submitted by 31 August 2025, and for which VZP ČR does not receive the relevant proposal, will be removed from the ÚK VZP – ZP (ZUM) as of 1 March 2026.
VZP hereby informs applicants of the possibility to keep non-traded ZUMs without EMDNin the Reimbursement Catalogue.
Applicants may, by 31 December 2025, submit the proposal “2. CH NÁVRH NA PONECHÁNÍ NEOBCHODOVANÝCH ZUM V ÚK VZP – ZP – VZP ČR” (Proposal to Retain Non-Traded medical devices in the ÚK VZP – ZP – VZP ČR) if they wish to keep non-traded medical devices without EMDN in the catalogue.
If the proposal is not submitted or is rejected, the ZUMs concerned will be removed from the ÚK VZP – ZP.
The amendment introduces a new approach to external price referencing, expanding the options for excluding an identified external reference price from the reference set.
The concept of deemed market availability is reframed—not only by adjusting the percentage threshold, but
also, for example, by setting new conditions for deeming similar medicinal
products available; changes also concern products with an agreed maximum price.
The rules for setting the base reimbursement
according to the daily cost of an alternative therapy are completely reworked.
Several new limitations/constraints are
introduced, e.g. for filing applications to change reimbursement or for certain
applications to set reimbursement. These include, for instance, limitations on
the formulation of reimbursement conditions and time limits for re-filing.
Changes also affect applications to amend the content of filings.
Further significant changes concern, for example commercially confidential information and the submission of (pharmacoeconomic) models.
Finally, there is a breakthrough regarding lis pendens, which previously prevented a separate proceeding to
obtain reimbursement for a new indication if a proceeding was pending—at any
stage—for reimbursement of the same product code in a different indication.
This is now altered by a new special provision.
In brief: the amendment
On 12 August 2025, the amendment to the Act on Public Health Insurance was promulgated in the Collection of Laws as No. 289/2025 Coll. Its general effective date is 1 January 2026, with selected provisions taking effect during 2026 or in subsequent years.
The amendment proposes substantial changes to the regulation of public health insurance. In the area of pricing and reimbursement of medicinal products, it will affect, for example: the process of external price referencing (EPR), the rules on deemed availability, the definition of Highly Innovative Medicinal Products (VILP), proceedings on reimbursement for VILPs and orphan medicinal products (LPVOs) used in combination, contractual commitments with payers, assessment of a product as an LPVO, similar medicinal products, lis pendens (litispendence), the submission of models, and review (revision) proceedings.
The reimbursement mechanism will also change—especially for vaccines and monoclonal antibodies intended for prophylaxis—and a special procedure for immunization medicines will be introduced.
At Pharmeca, we help you navigate the complex landscape of
pharmaceutical and medical device information. We also offer flexible services
that can be tailored to your needs at any time.
Our market position and experience allow us to support you whenever you
need expert guidance.
As part of our new article series, we briefly outline the key changes in the medicines domain linked to the amendment to the Act on Public Health Insurance. This instalment focuses on reimbursement...
For medicinal products included in
a reference group that are not granted a reimbursement amount or conditions
beyond those of interchangeable products, a cost-effectiveness analysis is not
required. Newly, however, a budget impact analysis (BIA) must be submitted including
a calculation of deductible co-payments.
According to the State Institute
for Drug Control (SÚKL), the BIA should consider all medicinal products
included in the relevant reference group. On the other hand, for example in
proceedings on price and reimbursement in reference group No. 104/7 –
therapeutic allergen extracts – standardised, depot injectable, the calculation
of deductible co-payments must reflect actual practice: a product containing
dust-mite allergens will in practice be replaced exclusively by products
containing only these allergens. For this reason, including other
interchangeable products (from the same reference group) in the BIA should not
affect the result, because their costs would be the same in the world with and
without the assessed intervention and therefore cancel out.
The analysis works with costs of
deductible co-payments that would accrue to health insurance companies when the
annual out-of-pocket cap is exceeded. Excluding the CZK 1,000 insured
person’s cap from the analysis was accepted by SÚKL in the above-mentioned case
as a conservative setting. SÚKL found that including a CZK 5,000 cap per
insured person would lead to higher deductions in the world with the assessed
intervention (CZK 5,000 per patient) than in the world without it (less than
CZK 5,000 per patient), thus lowering the resulting budget impact. If the CZK 1,000 cap were applied,
the patient in the world without the assessed intervention would exceed this
cap in the first year only, not in subsequent years. Even when accounting for
this lower cap, the resulting budget impact would remain lower.
The analysis should include separate
results for the budget impact without deductible co-payments and with deductible
co-payments.
Previously published SÚKL
guidance also states that the analysis must reflect co-payments actually
applied in practice. To calculate real deductible
co-payments, SÚKL uses average pharmacy prices per pack, obtained from reports
under guideline LEK-13.
Costs of deductible co-payments
relate to prescription-dispensed products; therefore, products billed on
requisition forms are not included in the consumption analysis.
Are you interested in reading regular commentaries on decisions by
Pharmeca a.s.? Feel free to contact us.
At Pharmeca, we help you navigate the complex landscape of
pharmaceutical and medical device information. We also offer flexible services
that can be tailored to your needs at any time.
Our market position and experience allow us to support you whenever you
need expert guidance.
A continuously
updated overview of decisions issued by SÚKL and the Ministry of Health in the
field of pricing and reimbursement is available on the Pharmeca a.s. website.
